Thursday, March 23, 2006



Blogger chimmychummy said...

idiot asshole sons of bitch moon-babies!
what a waste of cyber-space.
nice romancing of child-hood pants crapping.


8:23 AM  
Blogger neogeomancer said...

Wolfman: internal battles.
Frankenstein's Monster: Equivalent to a chicken nugget or a hot dog.

Wolfman: Still a man.
Frankenstein: Still a nugget.

In a battle of brawn, Frankenstein would eat Wolfman for a snack. In the battle of the brains, Wolfman kicks ass, then wakes up naked.

10:23 PM  
Blogger Weapon H said...

before Mary Shelley's Frankenstien the Movie there was Mary shelley's Frankenstein the Book, and if any of you fucks had read it you'd know that F-dog's Monster was Mensa material. He outsmarted the dick who made him, why not Wolfman Jack? Snikt!

10:02 PM  
Blogger Weapon H said...

sorry i called you a fuck, neogeo. i was in a berserker rage about movie jerx. now cooler heads prevail. claws in.

10:07 AM  
Blogger chimmychummy said...

i will fight anyone, anywhere.
behind the lair is perfect.
name the date!

signed- weopon h

8:43 PM  
Blogger Weapon H said...

be careful when you say fight, chimney . when we say "fight behind the lair", we're not talking about jackhammer special K.

still the monster. i just chipped my tooth.

10:55 PM  
Blogger arsonbear said...

has anyone ever discussed the integrity of the monster's stitches? i just feel like wolfman could quite easily hit a crucial stitch or two, and frankenstein is just gonna fall apart. then he can be as smart as he wants, but he's still in 6 or 7 pieces.
this round to Wolfman.

who is weapon H??? is "snikt" the new "knuckles?" and doweapon H's constant Wolverine references counter his attempts at being a snarky badass??

12:30 PM  
Blogger Weapon H said...

who is arson bear? what do you mean "attempts"? I'm the best at what I do, and what I do is post insightful yet insoucient commentary. now if you'll excuse me, i'm going to go see if insoucient means what i think it means. bub.

once again, sorry about the fucks. i'd been lurking here for a while and got lathered up by chimmychummy's tasmanian devil routine.

12:49 PM  
Blogger Weapon H said...

well, it doesn't mean anything close to what i thought. that's an ok point about the stitches, but this is chess.

12:54 PM  
Blogger Michael Tonight said...

true, but is wolfman even capable of playing chess without fighting? of playing chess at all? i don't think f's monster could win because wolfman probably isn't good enough at chess to lose. it's a draw.

how about frankenstein's monster vs. young frankenstein's monster? young frankenstein vs. young einstein? young eisenstein? goonies vs. monster squad. ok i'll stop now.

11:17 AM  
Blogger arsonbear said...

wolfman's got nards.

4:11 PM  
Blogger Michael Tonight said...

yes, but consider the size of yf's m's schwanzstück!! oof.

11:48 PM  
Blogger neogeomancer said...

Now that I've been thinking about this more, this chess match would never even take place. First of all, Wolfman is not going to spend his one wolfed out night of the month playing chess. And if he did, he wouldn't actually be playing chess. More like throwing rooks and knights around and eating the board while FM stared at a wall or something. So if he ever did get to play chess with Franks, it would just be as a man. Pretty boring.
Lon Cheney Jr. vs Boris Karloff?

9:58 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home