Thursday, March 23, 2006

WOLFMAN vs FRANKENSTEIN'S MONSTER In A Chess Battle!

6 Comments:

Blogger Weapon H said...

sorry i called you a fuck, neogeo. i was in a berserker rage about movie jerx. now cooler heads prevail. claws in.

10:07 AM  
Blogger Weapon H said...

be careful when you say fight, chimney . when we say "fight behind the lair", we're not talking about jackhammer special K.

still the monster. i just chipped my tooth.

10:55 PM  
Blogger Weapon H said...

who is arson bear? what do you mean "attempts"? I'm the best at what I do, and what I do is post insightful yet insoucient commentary. now if you'll excuse me, i'm going to go see if insoucient means what i think it means. bub.

once again, sorry about the fucks. i'd been lurking here for a while and got lathered up by chimmychummy's tasmanian devil routine.

12:49 PM  
Blogger Weapon H said...

well, it doesn't mean anything close to what i thought. that's an ok point about the stitches, but this is chess.

12:54 PM  
Blogger Michael Tonight said...

true, but is wolfman even capable of playing chess without fighting? of playing chess at all? i don't think f's monster could win because wolfman probably isn't good enough at chess to lose. it's a draw.

how about frankenstein's monster vs. young frankenstein's monster? young frankenstein vs. young einstein? young eisenstein? goonies vs. monster squad. ok i'll stop now.

11:17 AM  
Blogger Michael Tonight said...

yes, but consider the size of yf's m's schwanzstück!! oof.

11:48 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home